UN’s Antonio Guterres unveils global game plan for surveillance, control and censorship

07/11/2024 / By Belle Carter

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently released a framework program titled “Global Principles for Information Integrity,” which outlines key recommendations on population control, surveillance and censorship.

The said project promotes the globalist rhetoric of ending “harmful misinformation, disinformation and hate speech” online. It claims to make information spaces safer while “upholding human rights such as the freedom of speech.”

“At a time when billions of people are exposed to false narratives, distortions and lies, these principles lay out a clear path forward, firmly rooted in human rights, including the rights to freedom of expression and opinion,” Guterres said, addressing the media at the UN headquarters in New York.

Guterres urged governments, tech companies, advertisers and the public relations (PR) industry to take responsibility for spreading and monetizing content that results in harm. He also demanded that the media and advertisers take control and establish official narratives while suppressing opposition.

For SHTF Plan‘s Mac Slavo, the international organization is building an information surveillance and control system that crafts authoritarian narratives that limit access to the truth. These will not only censor but will dictate and will police people on what to say and think and how to behave.

“The UN wants to create a world of simps who surrender their sovereignty and bow down to manipulative and abusive entities and false authorities,” Slavo said.

He added that Big Tech’s algorithms or automated review processes will be programmed to filter and remove content deemed objectionable or politically sensitive, including blocking websites, social media posts or entire platforms that would criticize their chosen stakeholders. Slavo further predicted possible internet shutdowns or access restrictions to specific websites in times of political unrest or during manufactured crises.

“This tactic effectively silences dissenting voices, prevents the spread of information about protests or the abuses of governments and limits the ability of citizens to communicate and organize,” he said, citing what Meta did when it targeted and shut down community groups that discussed the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines’ damages during the pandemic.

Furthermore, surveillance technologies can be used to monitor online activities in real-time, track individuals’ digital footprints and identify dissenting voices, he pointed out.

This game plan would empower the government to enact laws and regulations that impose restrictions on digital content. The legislation will be crafted to be vague and broadly interpreted, allowing authorities to target journalists, activists or ordinary citizens who express views that are against the narrative.

“With this move, the UN and its military alliances are practically declaring war on the press, on research analysts and independent journalism,” Slavo concluded.

Elon Musk prefers to lose money from ads than suppress free speech

Big Tech mogul and X’s CEO said he would rather lose money from platform advertisers than submit to globalists’ desire to suppress free speech – a move that sets him apart from other tech companies such as Meta and Google. (Related: Member of Australian Senate calls for arrest, imprisonment of Elon Musk for not censoring enough speech on X.)

“There were some advertisers who were insisting on censorship and at the end of the day … if I have to make the choice censorship and money or free speech and losing money we’re going to pick the second,” Musk said back in June 2023. “We’re going to support free speech broadly then agree to be censored for money, which is, I think, the right moral decision.”

He disagreed with brands that believe there can be no content that they disagree with on the platform. “There’s an important distinction here that we don’t want to take money to censor broadly on the platform,” the Tesla founder explained. “I think that would be wrong.”

But he also clarified that he didn’t believe free speech meant people could say “illegal things” and reiterated the importance of “free speech within the bounds of the law.”

Asked if, as the boss of X, he regretted any of his comments on the platform in times gone by, Musk replied: “I do shoot myself in the foot from time to time, but at least you know it’s genuine, not some sort of PR. If you speak freely, there’ll be times when you are foolish, of course, but if you’re constantly going through a filter, you’re not real, so I guess it’s better to be real than go through a filter.”

Head over to SpeechPolice.news to read more news about globalist efforts to suppress free speech.

Watch the video below that talks about how Meta censored hashtag “revolution” on Facebook on July 4.

This video is from the alltheworldsastage channel on Brighteon.com.